Processed translations

Editor assessment

An entry from the translation pipeline, and its template's flaws are on display: 'processed' sits in the past tense where the imperative 'update translations' would match convention, and the message conveys nothing about scope of change — locales, file count, and direction of edits all live only in the diff. To its credit, the comma-separated i18n,client scope is a sensible partition of pipeline and target, the subject is brief, and the embedded PR number keeps the audit trail intact. The commit is clearly batch-generated, and the template's uniformity aids automation even if it starves human readers of detail.