Not to use an optional parameter before a required parameter

Editor assessment

The subject states the rule being enforced: an optional parameter must not precede a required one, phrased awkwardly as not to use. The chore type fits a signature-order correction. The body is a single link to a pull-request review comment, which is a legitimate pointer to the discussion but delegates the entire explanation elsewhere. No scope is present, though the signature area is implied. No footers appear. The message names the violated rule clearly but leans on the link for all context.