Placeholder password in hashed password example

Editor assessment

Terse but adequate: 'placeholder password in hashed password example' suggests a sample credential was corrected, which `fix` reasonably covers, though if the change is confined to documentation files, `docs` would be the more accurate type. The subject repeats 'password' twice and omits what was wrong with the placeholder — was it a real-looking secret (a security concern worth noting), a misleading format, or a typo? There is no scope, body, or reference to fill those gaps. For an example-fix this is a low-stakes commit, but a body quoting before/after would have made the history self-explanatory.