Updating tooltip documentation including the example for forward-Ref

Editor assessment

The subject states the scope of the update: tooltip documentation was revised, including the forwardRef example. The area and one concrete item are named, so the reader knows what was touched. The docs type matches. No scope is present, though the tooltip area is identified in the text. There is no body, acceptable for a documentation refresh whose specifics live in the files; the named example gives one anchor. No footers appear. The gerund updating departs from imperative mood, a minor note on a clear, adequate message.