Don't take client subscription into account for fork application

Editor assessment

The subject records a behavior change, that client subscription is no longer considered when forking an application, but never says why, and the chore type undersells what is a product decision rather than housekeeping. No body exists to supply the motivation, which this change clearly warranted: is the check wrong, redundant, or moving elsewhere? Without it, readers cannot judge the trade-off. The issue reference is attached and the sentence, while jargon-adjacent, is decodable. A behavior shift explained in one unmotivated line lands at acceptable but thin.