Processed translations

Editor assessment

Almost right, undermined by a typo in the scope itself: 'i8n' should read 'i18n', and a mistyped scope silently breaks history searches and changelog grouping for translation syncs. Given the Crowdin automation behind these imports, the mistake reads as systematic rather than a one-off. The subject 'processed translations' is past tense rather than imperative, though for a bot-driven bulk update that is a common house style. On the positive side, the Co-authored-by footer is exactly the sanctioned 'token: value' form, correctly attributing the Crowdin bot with a real address. Structure is otherwise clean, with a valid chore type, docs scope, no period, and no body required. Fixing the scope spelling is the one real improvement.