Processed translations

Editor assessment

This automated commit raises a quiet question about history hygiene: interchangeable headers across squashed translation batches make git log and git blame less informative over time, though the PR number restores traceability. As a message, this one is fine — chore matches content intake, the learn scope narrows the blast area, casing and punctuation are correct, and no body is warranted for mechanical edits. The participle 'processed' bends the imperative-mood guidance, a quirk consistent enough across this repository to count as house style. The comma-joined scope is the only interoperability concern.